Books

US National Defense for the Twenty-first Century: Grand Exit Strategy

Average customer rating:

One Superb Point, Missing the Other Half of the Idea
Good critique of America as world policeman

US National Defense for the Twenty-first Century: Grand Exit Strategy
Edward A. Olsen
Manufacturer: Routledge
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback

Military Science | History | Subjects | Books

General | Politics | Nonfiction | Subjects | Books

General | Science | Subjects | Books
ASIN: 0714681407

Book Description

US national security in the post-World War II years has been dominated by an internationalist/globalist policymaking establishment which scorns longstanding non-interventionist American traditions as "isolationist". As part of a revitalized debate over the future of the United States role in the world, this volume reviews and critiques flaws in the establishment's strategic thinking and the policies they have wrought.
Edward A. Olsen advocates an enlightened non-interventionist foreign and national security policy for the US based on a healthy form of inclusive civic nationalism which spurns both the nativist xenophobic stereotypes wrongly associated with neo-isolationism and embraces continued American economic and diplomatic engagement in world affairs.
After examining what is flawed in the United States' existing strategic vision, the virtues of non-interventionism are evaluated as the basis for a recommended new US strategic vision and restructuring of US defensive capabilities. Based on a proposed "Grand Exit Strategy", the scope of, and procedures for, American strategic disengagement from entangling military obligations worldwide are surveyed by region. The prospects for the United States implementing a non-interventionist policy through the political process and the likely national and international consequences are candidly evaluated.

Customer Reviews:

One Superb Point, Missing the Other Half of the Idea.......2003-07-06

This book is worth buying for its documentation of one really superb point, to wit, that the U.S. is in fact entangled in too many alliances requiring too much money and too much manpower to support, all of which in the aggregate hand-cuff the Nation and drain its resources. Right on--we should start with getting out of Korea and cutting all military assistance funds to the Middle Eastern nations.

Unfortunately, the book strikes a very libertarian and somewhat naive tone in suggesting that a Fortress America approach to national defense is both possible and desireable. Although published after 9-11, and by an author who is surely aware of the 32 failed states, 66 nations with mass migration issues, 33 countries with starvation, 59 with modern plagues, many with water scarcity and ethnic conflict--18 of which have degenerated into genocide in recent times--he marches blithly on without reference to the inherent vulnerability of the US--not just US forces, but US businesses and US citizens and US children in the heartland--to terrorism, disease, illegal immigration, and countless other threats to global stability (and therefore to US prosperity and security here behind the water's edge).

On balance, I do not regret buying this book. The author provides a tedious but worthwhile examination of why so many of our entangling alliances should be brought to an end--including NATO--and on this vital point we are in agreement. This is not, however a strategy--it is a policy, and only a half-baked policy at that, unless it is accompanied by a larger consideration of ends, ways, and means that will prevent the rest of the world from imploding in a manner most threatening to the USA.

Good critique of America as world policeman.......2003-02-25

As the US embarks on a dramatic expansion of military deployments and responsibilities overseas (Afghanistan and Iraq), it seems an appropriate time to consider the case against our post-WWII military globalism. Mr. Olsen presents a cogent and extremely well footnoted critique of America's self-appointed role as world policeman, and offers a blueprint for a set of policies to support an "isolationist" or "Fortress America" approach to our defense needs.

Mr. Olsen does a good job pointing out how this approach, by necessarily focusing on homeland defense, would better protect us against terrorism; presents an informative summary of the full extent of our "entangling alliances" around the globe; and documents our Allies unwillingness to pay the bill for their own defense. He covers all regions of the world in a plan for a retreat from our forward military deployments, including a discussion of Korea.

You don't see this kind of well-reasoned attack on our foreign policy underpinnings in the mainstream media very often, and I found it timely and interesting. It is up the reader to try to reconcile this approach, with say, a well-argued case for intervention and globalism in a specific case such as Iraq (Ken Pollack).

Books:

Books